In today’s world, there is a growing need for companies that not only seek profit but also address social problems. This is where social entrepreneurship plays a vital role. In this regard, social entrepreneurship has emerged as an important means to tackle major challenges (Hietschold et al., 2023) that society faces.
As a hybrid between traditional business models and non-profit organizations, social entrepreneurship combines innovative approaches to solving social issues with the strategies of for-profit companies. In this way, social entrepreneurship plays an important role in maintaining economic prosperity while benefiting society (Trabskaia et al., 2023).
Social entrepreneurship directly contributes to achieving greater sustainable development, improving well-being by reducing poverty, closing the gender gap, promoting decent work and economic growth, and driving sustainable development. In this sense, what exactly does it mean, and why is it gaining so much attention? This article will delve into the concept of social entrepreneurship, its key characteristics, examples, and how it is shaping a better future.
At its core, social entrepreneurship refers to the practice of starting businesses focused on generating social value while also making a profit. These enterprises aim to address social, environmental, and cultural problems by applying business principles. Rather than simply donating to a cause, social entrepreneurs seek sustainable and innovative solutions to society’s most pressing challenges.
The definition of social entrepreneurship can be understood as the process of seeking innovative solutions to social problems, often in areas where the government or traditional business models have failed. This movement is rooted in the belief that businesses should contribute to social well-being and environmental sustainability alongside their pursuit of profits. In this regard, Kamaludin (2023) states that sustainability in social entrepreneurship is defined as “the process of developing sustainable solutions for social, economic, or environmental problems that are not being addressed, with the capacity to endure over time through continuous improvement in operational efficiencies.”
On the other hand, the definition of social entrepreneurship includes a wide range of organizations: from non-profits that apply business strategies to achieve their goals to for-profit companies that incorporate social objectives into their missions. What distinguishes social entrepreneurship from traditional entrepreneurship is its mission-driven focus on addressing social issues.
Social value
According to Chou y Lin (2023), the implementation of effective social entrepreneurship can result in a better redistribution of wealth and well-being in society. In this sense, an important characteristic of social entrepreneurship is the generation of social value.
Cardella et al., (2021) highlight that social value is shaped by the pursuit of social progress, eliminating barriers to inclusion and helping those who are temporarily disadvantaged. Meanwhile, Hietschold et al. (2023) define “social value” as “a benefit or surplus derived by (disadvantaged) actors participating in market relations, while emphasizing the need to create positive indirect effects for specific actors not involved in the exchange.”
The research results of Nuchian et al., (2024) show that social enterprises create notable social value that explicitly results in economic empowerment, community improvement, professional growth, and political empowerment of their intended beneficiaries. Additionally, Badreddine et al., (2024) argue that social enterprises stimulate local economies, presenting sustainable solutions to complex social challenges.
Kim (2024), based on the results of his study on social entrepreneurship in South Korea, reports that social enterprises can help address employment issues for vulnerable populations, which are often the first to be affected by economic crises.
Successful social enterprises share common traits that distinguish them from traditional businesses. Kamaludin et al., (2021) report that social ventures have four key dimensions: social, economic, behavioral, and governance. Meanwhile, Sampaio y Sebastião (2024) highlight that social entrepreneurship and social innovation emerge as critical channels for social change.
In this regard, the main characteristics of social entrepreneurship that make these enterprises unique can be categorized as:
- Mission-oriented: Unlike traditional businesses, social enterprises focus on a mission to address specific social or environmental problems.
- Innovative solutions: Social entrepreneurs are known for their creativity and ability to design unique solutions to deeply rooted problems. Fernández-Guadaño y Diez (2023) highlight that social ventures contribute to innovation and sustainability.
- Financial sustainability: These enterprises aim to be self-sustaining. Instead of relying solely on donations or grants, they generate revenue through their activities.
- Scalability: Social enterprises seek to scale their solutions to reach more people and have a broader impact.
- Impact measurement: Tracking and measuring social impact are key aspects to ensuring the company’s mission is being effectively met.
Just as there are many forms of entrepreneurship, there are different types of social entrepreneurship, each with a unique approach and strategy for solving social problems. Understanding these types helps differentiate the various models and methods used by social entrepreneurs.
- Non-profit social enterprises: These organizations operate as non-profits but apply business strategies to achieve their goals. They often generate income but reinvest profits into their mission instead of distributing them to shareholders.
- For-profit social enterprises: These businesses aim to make a profit while also solving social or environmental problems. Unlike traditional companies, their primary purpose is not just to make money but to create a positive impact.
- Cooperative social enterprises: Cooperatives are owned and managed by the community or their employees. They focus on benefiting their members and the community, combining both profit-making and social good.
- Hybrid social enterprises: These businesses operate with a dual-purpose model, where both profit and mission are equally prioritized. They may be structured as for-profit companies but have a non-profit branch that focuses on social initiatives.
The social entrepreneur has a set of distinctive characteristics that differentiate them from other types of entrepreneurs. Here are the main ones:
Focus on Social Impact
- Main Purpose: The social entrepreneur is primarily motivated by solving social or environmental problems. Their mission is not only to generate profits but also to improve people’s quality of life or protect the environment.
- Measurable Impact: Their projects focus on generating a measurable impact on the community or environment.
Social Innovation
- Creative Solutions: They use innovation to create new solutions or improve existing ones, in order to address structural problems in society, such as poverty, inequality, and access to education, among others.
- Positive Disruption: They seek to transform traditional sectors through disruptive approaches that improve social well-being.
Sustainability
- Sustainable Model: Although they seek social impact, they also understand the importance of generating income to sustain their projects over the long term. They have a sustainability focus that allows them to reinvest profits into their cause.
- Triple Bottom Line: They aim to balance social, economic, and environmental aspects in their venture (known as the triple bottom line).
Community Orientation
- Local Empowerment: Social entrepreneurs often work closely with local communities, seeking to empower people to engage in solving their own problems.
- Collaboration: They prefer to work in networks and strategic alliances with other organizations, NGOs, governments, and businesses to maximize impact.
Resilience and Commitment
- Intrinsic Motivation: They are highly committed to their mission, which allows them to overcome the financial and logistical challenges they may face. Their motivation goes beyond economic rewards, making them more resilient.
- Patience and Persistence: Since many social solutions take time to bear fruit, social entrepreneurs are patient and persistent in their approach.
Social Responsibility
- Ethical Values: Social entrepreneurs operate under high ethical standards and seek to ensure their businesses reflect these values, treating everyone involved with respect and fairness.
- Transparency: They tend to be transparent about resource usage and the outcomes of their initiatives.
Adaptability
- Flexibility: The social entrepreneur is able to quickly adapt to changes in the environment or the needs of the community, adjusting their business models and strategies accordingly.
- Continuous Learning: They are constantly learning, seeking new ways to improve their solutions and maximize the positive impact of their initiatives.
Long-Term Focus
- Systemic Change: Unlike traditional projects that seek short-term gains, social entrepreneurs think in terms of long-term sustainability and how their solutions can generate lasting systemic change.
In summary, the social entrepreneur is a change agent who combines the passion for solving social or environmental problems with an entrepreneurial mindset. They are innovative, resilient, and committed to creating a positive and sustainable impact on society.
Differences between Social Entrepreneurship and Traditional Business
A common point of confusion is the difference between social entrepreneurship and traditional business models. While both aim to generate revenue, the key distinction lies in the motivation behind the venture. Social entrepreneurs prioritize social impact over profits, whereas traditional businesses focus primarily on maximizing shareholder value.
In social entrepreneurship, profits are often reinvested into the mission, either to expand the business or to enhance its social impact. On the other hand, traditional businesses usually distribute profits to shareholders, with less emphasis on creating broader social benefits.
Table 01 illustrates how, although both models seek financial sustainability, social entrepreneurship places greater emphasis on creating a positive impact for society, while traditional business focuses on economic profit as its main driver.
Table 01: Comparison between social entrepreneurship and traditional businesses.
Aspect | Social Entrepreneurship | Traditional Business |
---|---|---|
Main Objective | Solve a social or environmental problem, generate positive impact. | Maximize economic profits and shareholder value. |
Success Measured by | Social impact, sustainability, and secondary economic benefits. | Financial profit, growth, and profitability. |
Use of Profits | Reinvested to expand social impact or improve projects. | Profits are distributed to shareholders or reinvested for growth. |
Business Model | Sustainable, seeking a balance between revenue and social impact. | Generate revenue through products or services primarily focused on profit maximization. |
Mission | Focused on a social or environmental cause. | Focused on generating income and economic growth. |
Priorities | Prioritizes social or environmental well-being along with financial viability. | Prioritizes profitability and financial growth above other factors. |
Funding | Impact funds, donations, grants, crowdfunding, social investors. | Private capital, venture capital, bank loans, issuing shares. |
Return on Investment (ROI) | Return on both social impact and economic income. | Measured solely by financial performance and investor returns. |
Customer Focus | Empower and benefit the community or vulnerable individuals. | Focused on meeting customer needs for profitability. |
Scalability | Scale to increase social impact for more people or communities. | Scale to increase sales and expand the market. |
Corporate Culture | Based on social and ethical values, commitment to the community. | Focused on efficiency, performance, and competitiveness. |
Social Responsibility | Core to the business; the entire model revolves around creating positive change. | May incorporate corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions, but not as the main goal. |
Investors | Investors interested in both social impact and financial return. | Investors primarily interested in economic performance. |
Examples of Social Entrepreneurship
When discussing examples of social entrepreneurship, it’s important to highlight how these ventures manifest in real-world applications. Below are some examples of social enterprises from various sectors, showcasing the diversity and potential impact of this business model.
Grameen Bank: Microfinance for the Poor
Founded by Muhammad Yunus, Grameen Bank offers small loans to the rural poor in Bangladesh to help them start small businesses and escape poverty. The microfinance model has inspired similar approaches worldwide, demonstrating how financial services can empower disadvantaged communities.
TOMS Shoes – Buy One, Give One
TOMS Shoes is known for its “One for One” model. For every pair of shoes sold, another is donated to a child in need. This model has proven successful and expanded to include eyewear and other products that help provide essential services to underserved communities.
Warby Parker – Affordable Glasses with a Cause
Like TOMS, Warby Parker applies a “buy one, give one” model to glasses. For every pair purchased, another is given to someone in need. The company also focuses on sustainability by offering glasses made from eco-friendly materials.
These social enterprises illustrate the power of combining innovative business strategies with strong social missions.
Social Entrepreneurship Ideas
For those inspired by the concept of social entrepreneurship, generating viable ideas can seem overwhelming. Below are some innovative social entrepreneurship ideas that address various social and environmental issues:
- Sustainable Fashion Brands: Start a business focused on eco-friendly clothing, possibly using recycled materials or providing fair wages to workers.
- Tech for Good: Develop apps or platforms that improve access to education, healthcare, or basic services for marginalized communities.
- Renewable Energy Solutions: Provide affordable solar energy solutions to rural areas without electricity access.
- Ethical Supply Chains: Create businesses that ensure fair wages and working conditions for workers in developing countries.
These ideas show how various industries and innovations can be leveraged for social good.
Funding for Social Entrepreneurship
One of the main challenges for social entrepreneurs is obtaining funding. Unlike traditional businesses that seek venture capital, social entrepreneurship financing often comes from alternative sources that understand the dual mission of social impact and financial return.
Baker y Weerakoon (2024) indicate that social entrepreneurs rely on the resources and participation of numerous actors, as diverse as funders, policymakers, accelerators, investors, volunteers, universities, supply chain partners, NGOs, and, of course, customers and beneficiaries.
Below is a list of potential funding sources for social entrepreneurship:
- Impact Investors: These investors specifically seek businesses that aim to achieve measurable social impact while generating financial returns. They often invest in companies aligned with their values.
- Grants and Nonprofit Funding: Many social enterprises, especially nonprofits, rely on grants from governments, philanthropic organizations, or NGOs to finance their ventures.
- Crowdfunding: Platforms like Kickstarter and GoFundMe allow social entrepreneurs to raise money from individuals who support their cause.
- Social Impact Bonds: These are innovative funding models where private investors fund social programs, and governments repay them if the programs meet agreed-upon outcomes.
Understanding these pathways to financing social entrepreneurship is essential for any social entrepreneur seeking to sustain and grow their venture.
Why Social Entrepreneurship is Growing
The rise of social entrepreneurship is driven by several factors, including increasing awareness of social and environmental issues, the rise of conscious consumerism, and the availability of technology that facilitates scaling social impact.
The key drivers of social entrepreneurship include:
- Consumers Demand More: People today are more socially conscious and want to support companies that align with their values.
- Technology Enables Innovation: Whether through social media or crowdfunding platforms, technology has lowered barriers to launching and scaling a social enterprise.
- Support Ecosystems: Governments and NGOs are increasingly supporting social entrepreneurs through grants, impact bonds, and resources.
Conclusion
Social entrepreneurship is a powerful force for change in today’s world. By combining innovative business strategies with a passion for social good, social entrepreneurs are addressing some of the most pressing issues of our time, from poverty and inequality to environmental sustainability.
Understanding what social entrepreneurship is, recognizing its key characteristics, and exploring the examples provided can offer valuable insights for anyone looking to venture into this high-impact space. As the movement continues to grow, we can expect even more innovative solutions that benefit society while creating profitable businesses.
In the end, the most significant impact of social entrepreneurship lies in its ability to challenge the status quo, push boundaries, and demonstrate that businesses can be a force for good. Whether through creative social entrepreneurship ideas, understanding social entrepreneurship funding sources, or learning from established social enterprises, the potential to generate meaningful impact is immense.
References
Badreddine Amina, Larbi Chrif Hadjira. The Economic Impacts Of Social Entrepreneurship: Evidence From A Brief Literature Review. International Conference : Social Entrepreneurship and Social Work, University of Batna 1, Algeria, Apr 2024, Batna, Algeria. ⟨hal-04617976v2⟩
Baker, J. J., & Weerakoon, C. (2024). Deepening Insights Into Social Entrepreneurship by Leveraging Service-Dominant Logic. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2024.2316801
Chou, D. C., & Lin, B. (2023). Social Entrepreneurship Success: Relevance to Social Mediating Technologies. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 64(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2204822
Cardella, G. M., Raquel, B., Monteiro, A. A., & Carlos, J. (2021). Social Entrepreneurship Research: Intellectual Structures and Future Perspectives. Sustainability, 13(14), 7532. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147532
Fernández-Guadaño, J., Diez, R.M. Social Entrepreneurship Impact in Ten EU Countries with Supportive Regulations. J Knowl Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01513-4
Hietschold, N., Voegtlin, C., Scherer, A. G., & Gehman, J. (2023). Pathways to social value and social change: An integrative review of the social entrepreneurship literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(3), 564-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12321
Kamaludin, M. F., Xavier, J. A., & Amin, M. (2021). Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2021.1900339
Kamaludin, M. F. (2023). Social sustainability within social entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 192, 122541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122541
Kim, C. Y. (2024). Social Entrepreneurship, Employment, and Financial Performance: A Latent Growth Modeling Approach. Sage Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241249147
Nuchian, N., Nair Biju, A. V., & Reddy, K. (2024). An investigation on social impact performance assessment of the social enterprises: Identification of an ideal social entrepreneurship model. Business Strategy & Development, 7(1), e305. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.305
Sampaio, C., & Sebastião, J. R. (2024). Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: Uncovering Themes, Trends, and Discourse. Administrative Sciences, 14(3), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030053
Trabskaia, I., Gorgadze, A., Raudsaar, M., & Myyryläinen, H. (2023). A Bibliometric Analysis of Social Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Administrative Sciences, 13(3), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13030075