What Defines an Innovator? Definition, Core Characteristics, and Essential Skills for 2026

What Does It Truly Mean to Be an Innovator? While we currently associate this concept with the technological vanguard of Silicon Valley, its essence possesses deep historical roots. The term emanates from the Latin innovātor and, as early as 17th-century France, the word innovateur distinguished those who spearheaded disruptive transformations—not only in technique but within the structures of political and religious thought.

In the contemporary era, being an innovator transcends the mere generation of ideas; it represents the faculty to convert visions into tangible value for both the market and society. While creativity resides in the intellectual process of conceiving the unprecedented, innovation constitutes the strategic execution of such concepts, encompassing everything from operational optimization to the launch of high-impact solutions.

Key Takeaways

• Innovation Is Execution, Not Just Creativity: Whereas creativity is the mental process of generating ideas, innovation is the capacity to transform those visions into tangible value. Without real impact, it is merely an invention.
• A Learnable Skill, Not a Gift: Modern research confirms that innovation is an “active endeavor.” Through the practice of associative thinking, keen observation, and experimentation, anyone can develop their innovative potential.
• Psychological DNA Is the Differentiator: Great innovators are distinguished by their intellectual humility and their focus on the problem rather than their specific solution. Their resilience allows them to view failure as an essential learning tool for long-term success.
• Organizational Culture as a Catalyst: A company does not remain innovative solely by employing brilliant individuals; it requires a climate of trust, motivated human capital, and an agile structure that permits experimentation without penalizing error.
• Networking and Diversity as Critical Engines: Innovation rarely occurs in a vacuum. The ability to connect with diverse networks and collaborate across disciplines is what allows one to transcend “conventional wisdom” and generate disruptive solutions.

What Defines an Innovator? Meaning and Concept

To be an innovator (from the Latin innovātor) transcends the simple creation of the unprecedented. In essence, it refers to an individual, team, or organization with the capacity to introduce substantial modifications to existing elements or to implement entirely new concepts. While the Cambridge Dictionary defines an innovator as “someone who introduces changes and new ideas,” the contemporary innovator’s profile extends far beyond mere invention.

Having a brilliant idea is insufficient; the crux of innovation lies in the determination to transform that vision into a tangible and valuable solution. Whether through a product, service, business model, or a paradigm shift, a true innovator is one who successfully bridges the gap between creativity and strategic execution to generate a positive, measurable impact.

Core Pillars of Innovation

To understand the impact of an innovative profile, we must examine these four fundamental pillars:

• Introduction of Novelties: The ability to provide real value through either the modification of existing systems or the creation of new ones.
• Effective Implementation: The transition from thought to practice; an innovator does not merely imagine—they execute.
• Value Generation: Actions that result in operational improvements, efficiencies, or disruptive solutions that drive growth.
• Collective Dimension: Innovation is not exclusive to the individual; entire organizations can adopt this “DNA” to spearhead their respective markets.

Innovator, Inventor, and Entrepreneur: Key Distinctions within the Ecosystem

In the realm of progress and development, the terms innovator, inventor, and entrepreneur are frequently conflated. Although these roles often overlap, each performs a specific and vital function:

• Inventor: Focuses on the creation of the unprecedented. Their primary driver is technical or conceptual curiosity to bring an original prototype to life. A classic example is Thomas Edison with the incandescent light bulb, personifying the inventor before scaling his discovery.
• Innovator: Takes an existing invention or idea and adapts or improves it to maximize its value and efficacy. As noted by Noailles-Siméon (2013), the innovator is often preceded by the inventor, who possesses the idea but may lack the infrastructure to make it accessible to the public. Apple serves as the modern benchmark: they did not invent the MP3 player, but radically innovated through the iPod and iTunes ecosystem.
• Adaptor: According to Kirton’s Adaption-Innovation Theory, cited by Sockalingam et al. (2025), the adaptor exercises creativity and problem-solving by operating within established frameworks and systems.
• Entrepreneur: The strategist who identifies business opportunities and mobilizes the necessary resources to materialize a venture. Their goal is economic sustainability or social impact, such as a founder launching a startup based on disruptive business models.

Comparative Analysis: Roles in the Progress Ecosystem.

Profile	Primary Objective	Driving Force	Action Context
Inventor	Creation of the unprecedented.	Curiosity & technical resolution.	Laboratories & original prototyping.
Innovator	Generation of tangible value.	Practical application & diffusion.	Improvement & adaptation of existing ideas.
Adaptor	Operational efficiency.	Problem-solving within systems.	Established frameworks & structures.
Entrepreneur	Sustainability & business growth.	Opportunity & resource management.	Creation of companies or social projects.

The Bridge to Real Impact

Understanding these distinctions is crucial: innovation acts as the bridge between a pure idea and real societal impact. Recent research by Sockalingam et al. (2025) suggests that in collaborative environments, innovators and adaptors tend to exchange characteristics, enriching the creative process.

Ultimately, the success of an innovative individual depends on their ability to engage with their surroundings. In this regard, Koottatep et al. (2021) emphasize that managing innovation for development (social innovation) fundamentally requires building solid relationships with multiple strategic stakeholders.

Born or Made? The Path Toward an Innovative Mindset

One of the most frequent questions in the realm of personal and professional development is: Is innovation an innate gift or an acquired skill? The answer, backed by both science and expert experience, is profoundly encouraging.

While certain predispositions, such as natural curiosity, may facilitate the process, the capacity to innovate is, in essence, a set of skills, mindsets, and methodologies that anyone can learn, develop, and perfect. In this regard, Panikar et al. (2025) demonstrated in their research that the integration of Design Thinking with the TRIZ methodology serves as a decisive tool for cultivating innovative profiles that are conscious of their own technical and creative capabilities.

No one is born with the mastery to manage uncertainty or apply complex experimentation processes. These are strategic competencies consolidated through deliberate practice, constant exposure to new knowledge, and, above all, the adoption of a growth mindset. Therefore, the conclusion is definitive: innovation is cultivated. Transforming into a more innovative profile is a viable path that requires commitment, effort, and the willingness to transcend one’s comfort zone, both at an individual and organizational level.

Psychological DNA: What Lies Within the Mind of an Innovator?

According to research from prestigious institutions such as ESADE, an innovator’s profile transcends technical training; it is sustained by specific personality traits that act as catalysts for change. These attributes are not static; they are faculties that can be cultivated through practice:

• Intellectual Humility: The capacity to recognize the limitations of one’s own knowledge, allowing for the intake of fresh ideas without the barrier of the ego.
• Strategic Detachment: Innovators do not “fall in love” with their solution, but rather with the problem. This allows them to discard ineffective ideas and pivot with agility.
• Uncertainty Management: Understanding that innovation dwells in the unknown and that resilience in the face of error is an inherent part of the operational process.
• Disruption of the Status Quo: Possessing the courage to challenge the “this is the way it’s always been done” mentality and seek alternative paths.

The Science of the Innovative Personality

Contemporary research, such as that by Hernández et al. (2025), defines innovation as a trait integrating two critical factors: creativity (originality) and an active disposition toward trying new things. However, this path is not without human challenges. Ernst and Matter (2025) warn that under high pressure, innovators are subject to cognitive biases and ego depletion (the exhaustion of self-regulation), which can impact their behavior within a team.

Competency Metrics: The Deptuła & Nosal Model

To measure an expert’s capacity within high-uncertainty environments, Deptuła and Nosal (2025) propose four determining factors:

• Response to Uncertainty (RU): Defines the attitude toward risk. A high result on this scale indicates difficulty adapting to stressful or unexpected situations.

• Open-mindedness (OM): A disposition toward new information and a preference for complex challenges. Higher scores correlate with greater innovative competence.

• Closed-Mindedness (CLM): Characterizes those who limit their exploration to narrow conceptual categories; a high score here typically hinders the implementation of novelties.

• Cognitive Motivation (CM): The level of internal drive to generate unprecedented solutions. This is the primary engine in crisis scenarios.

Core Characteristics of an Innovative Mind

Beyond technical expertise, an innovator’s profile is distinguished by personality traits that act as catalysts for change. According to a study by Fronzetti et al. (2023), these qualities do not merely surface during the search for solutions; they manifest organically in social interactions and networking behavior, revealing a unique “collaborative DNA.”

Identifying these traits is the first step toward cultivating them. For team leaders, these characteristics are the definitive tools for detecting high-potential innovators:

• Insatiable Curiosity: The constant desire to challenge the status quo with questions like, “What if…?”
• Critical and Analytical Thinking: The faculty to decompose complex problems and connect seemingly disparate ideas.
• Resilience and Failure Tolerance: The ability to view error as valuable data and a learning opportunity, rather than a dead end.
• Forward-Looking Vision: The skill to anticipate trends and visualize opportunity scenarios before they become evident.
• Action Orientation (Proactivity): A preference for experimentation over theory—the “fail fast, learn faster” philosophy to materialize ideas.
• Adaptability and Flexibility: Agility in adjusting approaches to changing circumstances, successfully navigating uncertainty.
• Empathy: The capacity to deeply understand user “pain points,” designing solutions with a real purpose.

Critical Competencies for 2026

Complementing these traits, Varga et al. (2025) identify three essential competency blocks that define the modern innovator:

1. Cognitive Skills: Applied creativity, sensitivity to complex problems, and critical thinking.
2. Social Skills: Negotiation prowess, strategic networking, and profound empathy.
3. Change Management: The faculty to detect market opportunities and successfully implement structural changes.

Types of Innovators: Where Do You Fit In?

Having understood the psychological and social competencies, it is time to analyze how these profiles manifest in the real world. According to the research of Dyer et al. (2019), there are four primary categories of innovative individuals, each with a distinct focus and field of action:

• Startup Entrepreneurs: These are individuals who identify market opportunities and build organizations from the ground up to exploit them. They typically operate under high levels of uncertainty and are characterized by a disruptive vision that seeks to change the “rules of the game” within an industry.
• Corporate Entrepreneurs (Intrapreneurs): Unlike the former, these innovators operate within established organizations. Their mission is to spearhead new projects or business units from inside the company, leveraging corporate resources to drive renewal and competitiveness.
• Product Innovators: Their primary focus is on the “what.” They are dedicated to conceiving and materializing new or significantly improved goods and services. They excel at detecting unmet user needs and transforming them into tangible commercial solutions.
• Process Innovators: Their focus is on the “how.” These profiles seek operational efficiency by optimizing supply chains, manufacturing methods, or service delivery. Their value lies in cost reduction, quality enhancement, and accelerating lead times.

The Technological Innovator: Leading the Vanguard

In an environment where technology evolves at a breakneck pace, innovation has solidified itself as the master pillar of business success. Today, being a technological innovator is not an option but an imperative necessity to stand out in a hyper-competitive global market.

What Defines a Technological Innovator?

A technological innovator is an individual or organization that incessantly explores new ways to enhance products and services through advanced digital tools. Their purpose is to remain at the forefront of emerging trends, transforming technical information into disruptive solutions that generate a differentiating and measurable value.

R&D Investment as a Survival Factor

The modern business fabric recognizes that Research and Development (R&D) is the engine of relevance. Organizations that prioritize R&D investment successfully anticipate consumer demands, while those that neglect this investment face the risk of obsolescence and loss of competitiveness.

A Guide to Becoming a Technological Benchmark

Becoming a technological innovator requires a structured approach and a specific mindset:

• Creativity and “Out of the Box” Thinking: The ability to approach problems from unprecedented perspectives to find solutions that others overlook.

• Experimental Mindset: A technological innovator must possess an open mind and be willing to experiment with new tools, embracing risks and managing failure as a necessary stage of learning.

• Technological Scouting (Vigilance): It is vital to constantly monitor the latest trends. This involves dedicating resources to continuous learning, attending specialized forums, and cultivating a network of industry experts.

Master Skills of the Practitioner Innovator

While innovative thinking may manifest innately, key research such as that by Dyer et al. (2019) confirms that these capacities can be strengthened through deliberate practice. Below, we break down the competency profile that defines leaders of change, integrating findings from Fronzetti et al. (2023) and Forsman & Temel (2016):

• Strategic and Collaborative Networking: The innovator invests energy in building networks with diverse profiles to gain radically different perspectives. Forsman and Temel (2016) emphasize that innovation policies must foster networking not only for exploration (creating something new) but also for exploitation (bringing that innovation to commercial success).

• Associative Thinking: The faculty to successfully connect questions, problems, or concepts from seemingly unrelated fields. The innovator does not see silos; they see bridges where others see barriers, allowing solutions from one industry to transform an entirely different one.

• The Art of Questioning: Great innovative milestones are born from specific inquiries. To effectively challenge the status quo, innovators master three critical questions:

• Why? (To understand the root of the present).
• Why not? (To dismantle self-imposed limitations).
• What if…? (To project future scenarios).

• Acute and Intentional Observation: Innovators do not just look; they observe. They identify disruptive ideas by examining everyday phenomena and potential customer behaviors, focusing on subtle details from suppliers and competitors to detect inefficiencies and turn them into opportunities for improvement.

• Thematic and Strategic Orientation: According to Fronzetti et al. (2023), an innovator’s language betrays their focus: their messages are intrinsically linked to business performance, marketing, and growth. Their communication reflects a constant concern for new business opportunities and market evolution.

• Active Experimentation: For the innovator, the world is their laboratory. Like a scientist, they test ideas through rapid prototyping and pilot launches. The ability to design and execute experiments is what separates a dreamer from a creator of real value.

The 10 Traits of Innovative Leadership According to Forbes

Based on global research by Bagley (2014) for Forbes, ten distinctive characteristics define great innovators. These leaders do not merely seek change; they transform their organizations’ core culture:

1. Disruptive Boldness: They commit to doing things differently or executing what has never been attempted.
2. Values-Based Leadership: They build dynamic, productive organizations rooted in a real ethical commitment.
3. Systems Awareness: They understand that innovation never occurs in isolation.
4. Commitment to Diversity: They value multiple viewpoints to decode complex challenges.
5. Horizontal Leadership: They abandon the “high-control, low-trust” model to lead from the center.
6. Aversion to Shortcuts: They do not fear complexity or major risks if they lead to real solutions.
7. Continuous Evolution: They recognize that competitiveness demands constantly moving beyond past achievements.
8. Breaking Conventions: They possess the courage to question “traditional wisdom” and think outside the box.
9. Vision Beyond Metrics: They understand that traditional indicators can sometimes stifle disruptive breakthroughs.
10. Radical Originality: They contribute fresh ideas, even when they appear unconventional.

Pillars of the Innovative Mindset

To put these traits into practice, an innovative individual must cultivate four fundamental pillars in their daily routine:

• Strategic Resilience Toward Failure: Rather than merely accepting error, the innovator capitalizes on it. It is perceived not as a setback, but as valuable data that allows for idea refinement. This capacity for continuous learning is what guarantees long-term success.
• Disruption of the Status Quo: The innovator is a nonconformist by nature. By challenging established practices, they generate solutions that not only improve upon the existing but can potentially revolutionize entire industries.
• Cognitive Openness and Curiosity: Maintaining an open mind allows for viewing problems from unprecedented angles. By constantly questioning assumptions, the innovator remains at the forefront of their field, exploring frontiers that others ignore.
• Collaboration and Radical Feedback: Knowing that one does not have all the answers is a strength. The innovator actively seeks constructive criticism and a diversity of opinions, using feedback as a polishing tool to turn a good idea into an exceptional solution.

Practical Guide: How to Cultivate Your Innovative Profile

Becoming an innovator is not a fortuitous event but a process of deliberate training. Here are the master strategies to initiate this journey of continuous transformation:

• Expand Intellectual Curiosity: Do not limit yourself to your field of expertise. Read across disciplines, explore foreign subjects, and keep the question “Why?” alive. Active learning is the fuel of innovation.
• Foster Cross-Pollination of Ideas: Interact with people from diverse backgrounds and cultures. Diversity of thought is arguably the most powerful engine for generating disruptive concepts.
• Sharpen Critical Observation: Train your eye to detect everyday inefficiencies and unmet needs. The greatest opportunities are often hidden in plain sight, waiting to be identified.
• Low-Risk Experimentation: It is not necessary to found a company to innovate. Begin by validating assumptions through rapid prototypes and small-scale tests that allow you to iterate with agility.
• Redefine Your Relationship with Failure: Adopt a mindset where failure is analyzed as a learning unit. Extract objective lessons and apply them immediately to your next cycle.
• High-Value Networking: Build a strategic network with mentors and fellow innovators. The exchange of feedback is what allows a nascent idea to evolve into a robust solution.
• Specialization in Agile Methodologies: Invest in training on modern frameworks such as Design Thinking, Lean Startup, or Agile. These tools provide the necessary structure to channel creativity.
• Strategic Reflection Spaces: Reserve blocks in your schedule exclusively for deep thinking. The connection of complex ideas rarely occurs in the midst of operational chaos.

The Value of Training and Mentorship

As Varga et al. (2025) correctly point out, for innovation to move from a desire to an implemented reality, the development of specific competencies and, above all, mentorship from experienced innovators is essential. Having structured guides and training programs is the determining factor for the success of any corporate or personal innovation process.

The Role of the Innovator: An Engine for Business and Society

In today’s landscape, the figure of the innovator has become indispensable. Within the corporate ecosystem, organizations that commit to innovation not only lead their markets and attract the brightest talent, but also demonstrate superior resilience in the face of global crises. As Bagley (2014) contends, success lies in leaders capable of instating a culture where creativity and experimentation are the norm, rather than the exception.

Overcoming the “Innovator’s Dilemma”

However, the path toward transformation is not without obstacles. Established corporations often fall into the “Innovator’s Dilemma,” a concept pioneered by Clayton Christensen. This phenomenon explains how previous success and operational efficiency can become a barrier, preventing the adoption of disruptive innovations for fear of cannibalizing the current business model. In this scenario, the agile innovator—possessing an external and disruptive vision—is the one who defines the competitive edge.

The Innovator as an Agent of Social Change

On a global scale, innovators are the architects of solutions for critical challenges such as public health and climate change, opening new frontiers for human progress through social innovation processes. Nevertheless, this mission carries a complex ethical burden. Ernst and Matter (2026) warn of a contemporary challenge: although innovators acknowledge their social responsibility, the pressure for accelerated development cycles and immediate results can relegate ethical impact to the background.

Sustainability Strategies: How Do Companies Remain Innovative?

Having brilliant individuals is not enough; if an organization lacks a culture of innovation, it risks stifling its own initiatives. The transition from sporadic innovation to an installed capability requires a systemic and strategic approach.

The Return on Innovation Investment

The primary motivation for maintaining this pace is, undoubtedly, profitability. Stoffman et al. (2022) report that small firms that protect their innovations through patents achieve significantly higher future financial returns than their competitors. Furthermore, Rosário et al. (2024) emphasize that the success of “serial innovators” depends on three pillars:

• Intensive Collaboration: Leveraging open ecosystems.
• Public Support: Favorable regulatory frameworks.
• High-Skilled Talent: Strengthening global creative capacity.

The Three Pillars of Industrial Leadership

What allows a company to lead its sector for decades? According to a study by Tuzovic et al. (2018), innovative longevity is sustained by three critical axes:

1. Innovation Climate: Leadership focused on a service culture and openness to change.
2. Human Capital: Aligned recruitment processes, continuous training, and incentive systems that reward experimentation.
3. Resource Configuration: Structures, systems, and processes designed for agility rather than mere efficiency.

Innovation in Times of Crisis

Responsiveness to adversity is another differentiator. Lien and Timmermans (2023) conclude that, while crises act as catalysts, real long-term value is only captured by firms that already possessed prior experience in innovation and organizational agility. Crisis-induced innovation is most effective when built upon an established foundation.

Precision Tools for the Future

To ensure the success of these processes, science continues to provide measurement tools. Deptuła and Nosal (2026) introduced the “Expert-Innovator Behavior Questionnaire (EIBQ),” an instrument specifically designed to identify specialists capable of evaluating and managing risks in complex innovation processes.

Conclusion: Innovation as an Active Commitment

Being an innovator is not a privilege reserved for a few geniuses; it is the convergence of a strategic mindset, cultivable traits, and learnable technical skills. Throughout this analysis, we have demystified the figure of the innovator, distinguishing it from roles such as the inventor or the entrepreneur, and we have established that the capacity to generate real value is a faculty accessible to everyone.

The fundamental question does not lie in whether an innovator is born or made, but in one’s personal willingness to embark on this developmental journey. By fostering curiosity, resilience, and radical collaboration, both individuals and organizations cease to be mere observers and become authentic, transformative forces. In a global environment that demands constant adaptation, innovation is not just the key to survival—it is the ultimate strategy for prosperity.

As Dyer et al. (2019) aptly state, “innovative entrepreneurship is not a genetic predisposition, it is an active endeavor.” This perspective allows us to take responsibility for evolving our own capabilities. To achieve this, Dumbuya (2025) concludes that empowering the innovators of tomorrow requires a multidimensional approach: a balanced integration of technical education, mastery of the craft, and solid business training.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Reference

Bagley R. 2014. The 10 Traits Of Great Innovators. Forbes.

Deptuła, A. M., & Nosal, C. S. (2025). Expert-innovator behaviour questionnaire as a new tool for selecting potential experts. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 17(2), 106-116. doi: 10.2478/emj-2025-0015

Dumbuya, E. (2025). Empowering Tomorrow’s Innovators: Skills, Trade, and Entrepreneurship for a Sustainable Future. Online Submission.

Dyer J., H. Hal Gregersen, and Clayton M. Christensen. 2019. The Innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Harvard Business Review Press.

Ernst, L. E., & Matter, P. (2025). The ethical innovator: bridging the gap for integrating ethics into digital innovation practice. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2025.2476246

Forsman Helena & Serdal Temel (2016) From a Non-Innovator to a High-Innovation Performer: Networking as a Driver, Regional Studies, 50:7, 1140-1153, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.968120

Fronzetti Colladon, A., Toschi, L., Ughetto, E., & Greco, F. (2023). The language and social behavior of innovators. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113317

Hernández-Méndez, J. C., Ulloa, R. E., & Rosetti, M. (2025). Who is the innovator? How do life-history, demographics, risk-taking propensity, and attention deficit and hyperactivity symptoms correlate with self-perceived innovativeness. Personality and Individual Differences, 233, 112935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112935

Koottatep, Thammarat, Krisakorn Sukavejworakit, and Thanaphol Virasa. 2021. “Roadmap for Innovators in the Process of Innovation for Development” Sustainability 13, no. 1: 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010084

Lien, L., & Timmermans, B. (2023). Crisis-induced innovation and crisis-induced innovators. Industry and Innovation, 31(2), 183–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2023.2228739

Nielsen, Christian. 2020. The Net Innovator Score. Working Paper, Aalborg University Business School, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3719711

Noailles-Siméon, Patrice. (2013). Innovator. In: E. Carayannis (ed). Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Springer.

Panikar, P, Milligan, C, Al Bulushi, AH, Rizwan, SM & Al Balushi, N 2025, ‘Empowering future innovators: a TRIZ-Integrated Design Thinking approach to engineering prototyping and entrepreneurship in Oman’,International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 322-351.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.2.17

Rosário, C., Varum, C., & Botelho, A. (2024). Unlocking the Code to Continuous Innovation: A Study of Key Determinants for Serial Innovators. Administrative Sciences, 14(3), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030045

Sockalingam, N., Liu, S. Y., Huang, Q., Kaur, A., & Willems, T. (2025). Adaptors’ and innovators’ failure tolerance and innovative tendencies in design-based learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101832

Stoffman, Noah and Woeppel, Michael and Yavuz, M. Deniz, Small Innovators: No Risk, No Return (March 7, 2022). Journal of Accounting & Economics (JAE), Forthcoming, Kelley School of Business Research Paper No. 19-5, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3291471

Tuzovic S., J. Wirtz, L. Heracleous. 2018. How do innovators stay innovative? A longitudinal case analysis. Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2017-0052

Varga, K., Veresné Somosi, M., & Lipták, K. (2025). The role of social innovation and innovator competencies in the local economic development of disadvantaged settlements. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 11, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2026-1643